Tuesday, May 12, 2009

[The Hit List Users] Re: iphone app

Aha, I didn't catch that you already were using RTM. Well, if you
have a process AND apps to implement it, then it's an uphill battle
for sure.

For the way I work (80% at my computer), there were a few features of
THL that killed any other alternative - I really needed that speed and
flexibility that RTM didn't give me. The 20% away does sting but I
don't even have an iTouch yet.

I think a fairly straightforward mapping might happen with ToodleDo
(RTM could handle the Smart Folders, but not ToodleDo, from what I
see), so if we could sync with that and use the ToodleDo (or
PocketInformant!!) apps on the go that might even be better yet.

It didn't sound like you were telling others how to work, I just
didn't understand your comment on revenue. It will come, and likely
more so, if people wait until after 1.0.

On May 12, 10:49 am, Bret <bretrbow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> BoxofSnoo,
>
> Thanks for the reply. Since there is seamless sync with my current
> setup in Remember the Milk, there is no compelling reason to spend
> extra time developing my own unsupported process that I have to
> manage.  I think the Hit List will be an option for me once it is
> released with an iPhone app.  The desktop app is easy to use and
> presents more flexibility than RTM.
>
> You did a great job of summarizing my point regarding the extra $20 so
> I think you understand my reasoning.  However, creating custom sync
> solutions and expending the energy to manage them when they break,
> require reformatting, etc, is not something I have the skills or
> desire to deal with.  That is all I was trying to say.  I wouldn't
> dare try to tell anyone else how to make a decision regarding their
> own system.
>
> My post was just one man's opinion....mine.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On May 11, 12:49 pm, BoxOfSnoo <jmarkev...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I don't understand your reasoning.  If you don't want to buy in now,
> > before there is an iPhone app, that's fine, you can wait and pay $20
> > more.  I don't think Andy will mind!  If you do want to buy in now,
> > you save some money but you have to accept that not everything is
> > finished - including an iPhone app.
>
> > If your process immutably requires a portable solution (which is very
> > understandable) you can follow any of the suggestions already posted
> > including the iCal sync section of the app.
>
> > On May 11, 11:23 am, Bret <bretrbow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Personally, I respect Andy's plan to build out his desktop app first.
>
> > > However, I believe the big trade-off will be the loss of early revenue
> > > due to user decisions not to pay up front for the tool since there is
> > > no "published" plan or milestone date for iPhone development and
> > > delivery.  The difference between buying now and after 1.0 is ready is
> > > not a large amount of money to avoid the risk of a late-blooming
> > > iPhone app.  Without a roadmap (with a milestone date for iPhone app
> > > delivery) I will hold off on paying any money and enjoy using the
> > > beta.
>
> > > The beta has been great but I find that I cannot use THL "effectively"
> > > in my day to day process without an iPhone app.  I do leave my Mac in
> > > my office while doing other things in life.  I did try loading up a
> > > PDF of all of my tasks to Google Docs for a simple view but that added
> > > yet another step (which I always seemed to forget before going out).
>
> > > I look forward to a published plan for an iPhone app - without feeling
> > > "entitled" to have one :)
>
> > > My voice is heard through my decision not to pay the lower, up-front
> > > price (and sharing it on this forum).
>
> > > Thanks to everyone for keeping this forum productive and friendly.
>
> > > Andy, thanks for making what will surely be a best of breed task
> > > manager.  Keep it up!
>
> > > On May 10, 5:38 am, etichenor <etiche...@me.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Wanting an iPhone app is not an entitlement.  It is simply asking for
> > > > a feature that is already promised by Andy.  The whole point of this
> > > > product is to increase a person's productivity.  Being able to access
> > > > my data on the iPhone would greatly help me do that.  As it is, I am
> > > > using multiple workarounds using the free Appigo Todo and Evernote to
> > > > be able to sync back to THL and keep track of my data.  Having a more
> > > > seamless integration only makes sense.  THL is already an awesome
> > > > product.  Having the iPhone app will make it even better.  I for one
> > > > would pay $10 for the iPhone app without any hesitation and I imagine
> > > > many others would do the same.
>
> > > > On May 7, 5:21 pm, Neo <neal.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Feature Request:
> > > > > Temporarily remove the iPhone Sync tab from THL Preferences to help
> > > > > the Entitled be more patient.
> > > > > ;)
> > > > > PS to The Entitled:  B-E-T-A. Get it?http://tr.im/kJIT
> > > > > Also: THL is not for sale.  If you paid already, you placed a PRE-
> > > > > ORDER for v1.0! (http://tr.im/kJJH).
> > > > > Go away and let Andy work.
>
> > > > > On May 7, 8:50 am, Michael <mcwers...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > I agree...
>
> > > > > > Also, let's not forget that iPhone OS 3.0 is coming out. Right now it
> > > > > > would probably/maybe make more sense to develop the iPhone app using
> > > > > > the new SDK (which would make it impossible to release the app now).
> > > > > > Developing using the iphone 2.x SDK, then porting it to the 3.x SDK
> > > > > > would be even more work. At least that's what I think (I don't know
> > > > > > much about the iPhone SDKs).
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Hit List Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to the-hit-list-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to the-hit-list-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/the-hit-list-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

No comments:

Post a Comment